Iron Mountain – Blueprint for Tyranny.avi

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8025268149177312936

This is one of those real enigmatic conspiracy items. Much like the Protocols of Zion, it can be one of the best hoaxes ever, or a real deal that was discredited as a hoax.

The thing is, many of the wildest portions are becoming reality. Even if its an elaborate hoax, it can be read like the novel 1984. A work of fiction from someone who had connections to the truth. The report itself may be a fabrication, and I underscore may be. But the vision is becoming reality.

Iron Mountain – Blueprint for Tyranny

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message421404/pg1

This is one of those real enigmatic conspiracy items. Much like the Protocols of Zion, it can be one of the best hoaxes ever, or a real deal that was discredited as a hoax.

The thing is, many of the wildest portions are becoming reality. Even if its an elaborate hoax, it can be read like the novel 1984. A work of fiction from someone who had connections to the truth. The report itself may be a fabrication, and I underscore may be. But the vision is becoming reality.

The Report from Iron Mountain – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Report_From_Iron_Mountain

From the page: “However, it was not until five years later that the work was confirmed to be a hoax. In 1972, fretting how the Pentagon Papers and other documents about the Vietnam War “read like parodies of Iron Mountain rather than the reverse”[1] , Lewin confessed in the March 19 New York Times Book Review that he had written the entire report. It was even listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the “Most Successful Literary Hoax.”

Even after his admission, however, there are those who believe the so-called hoax is indeed a real government work and was called a hoax to discredit the report. In 1991, Oliver Stone used a quote from the hoax in the movie, JFK; one of Stone’s story consultants, former Intelligence officer L. Fletcher Prouty, believed the hoax was real. Many believers cite the Hegelian Thesis model as a theory behind its disclosure.

On November 26, 1976, the report was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), said that he knew firsthand of the report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the report, he agreed totally with its conclusions.
He wrote: ‘As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservation relate only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public.’[4]“

Iron Mountain, 1967

http://www.umsl.edu/~thomaskp/imoun.htm

From the page: “Following is the U.S. News & World Report on The Report from Iron Mountain
from November 20, 1967. The Iron Mountain Report continues to have some
currency among conspiracy researchers. Hoaxed or not, the unintentially humorous
situation its publication set off should not be lost on readers. Pentagon
bureaucrats found it so plausible that, according to the caption underneath a DC skyline
photo that accompanied this article, “In Washington, a “manhunt” began for the unidentified
author.” “Hoaxed” political analysis reached a new peak recently with the publication
of The Real Report on the Last Chance to Save Capitalism in Italy. Those with
an interest in Iron Mountain would do well to check out the Real Report, reviewed
near the bottom of the main Steamshovel page with a link to its publisher, Flatland Books.”

Analyzing The Anthrax Attacks – 2009-2011 edition

http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/

A debumker’s site. Well documented in many areas. Bad graphics? I don’t know, but his material is as well documented or better than many of the conspiracy sites.

http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-theories/4075-maurice-chatelain-apollo.html

From the page: “According to our best information, Chatelain had little if anything to do with Apollo, and worked only as a low-level technicial for a subcontractor prior to operational missions. However, he has made quite a name as a UFO writer and speaker. His followers, including “Cosmic” Dave Cosnette, have even elevated him to “Chief of Communications” at NASA.

There is considerable evidence that he would have had no first-hand experience with any communications on any Apollo mission.”

McCain taps Alaska Gov. Palin as vice president pick – CNN.com

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/29/palin.republican.vp.candidate?imw=Y

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, here in February, will be Sen. John McCain’s running mate, the campaign announced.

(CNN) — Sen. John McCain on Friday announced Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential candidate, calling her “the running mate who can best help me shake up Washington.”

“She’s exactly who this country needs to help me fight the same old Washington politics of me first and country second,” the presumptive Republican nominee said at a Dayton, Ohio, rally of about 15,000 supporters, who welcomed the surprise pick of the relatively unknown politician with cheers and flags. “She’s got the grit, integrity, good sense and fierce devotion to the common good that is exactly what we need in Washington today,”

Will McCain pick a chick? – Skirts – Macleans.ca

http://blog.macleans.ca/2008/08/28/will-mccain-pick-a-chick/

Seems like the reporter babe was correct on her prognosticating that McCain would pick a VP babe. Master stroke indeed:

From the page: “And the potential masterstroke: Sarah Palin, the 44-year-old governor of Alaska. She’s charismatic, popular (her approval rating is over 90) and a mother of five (including a newborn). She’s also a member of Feminists for Life so the pro-life McCain could score points endorsing female power while continuing to contain their reproductive rights. She’ll appeal to the GOP faithful (she’s pro-gun) but is known to stand up to oil companies. It’s high-risk/high-reward choice: the June-November pairing could give McCain’s campaign vitality and generational breadth. Or it could end up making him look like her out-of-it dad. But, then again, if John McCain brought aboard a working mother of five to replace Dick Cheney he’d go down as the most subversive presidential candidate in history. “