Archive for May, 2009

22
May
09

http://fightingtyranny.ning.com/video/video/show?id=2103698%3AVideo%3A52763

From the page: “New World Order is a feature-length documentary about conspiracy theorists. The film is a behind the scenes look at the underground anti-globalist movement. This growing movement targets the annual Bilderberg conference, and the 9/11 attacks as focal points in the alleged global conspiracy.

Alex Jones, a celebrity radio host, and underground cult hero, is the main character of the film. The film chronicles Alex (of Waking Life and A Scanner Darkly), and four other conspiracy theorists, on their ceaseless quests to expose the ‘massive global conspiracy’ that they believe threatens the future of humanity”

19
May
09

Adam Kokeshs speech (Revolution March)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7W6Xp6GG0M

From the page: “Another one of the epic moments from a historic day.”

15
May
09

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97956

From the page: “
Obama meeting with ACORN leaders as an Illinois Senate candidate”

05
May
09

News Archives | CJOnline.com

http://www.cjonline.com/stories/050597/cincodemayo.html

From the page: “If outnumbered, outgunned Mexican troops hadn’t defeated professional French invaders 135 years ago today, we might all be whistling “Dixie.”

After five years of civil war, Mexico was bankrupt in 1861. The beleaguered government of President Benito Juarez owed staggering sums to France, Great Britain and Spain.

In 1823, President James Monroe had put Mexico and the rest of the Western Hemisphere off limits to European intervention.

However, the United States was unable to enforce the Monroe Doctrine after the Civil War erupted. French, British and Spanish forces landed in Mexico to make certain Mexico paid its debts.

The British and Spaniards soon withdrew after seeing the French emperor, Napoleon III, had more on his mind than money.

Napoleon landed an invasion force intent on marching north from the port of Veracruz, taking Mexico City and continuing into Texas to support Confederate troops in the American South.

France then could easily have convinced England to break the Union’s blockade of Southern ports, freeing shipping lanes for supplies.

The outcome of the Civil War could have turned had not the crack French troops, many of them veterans of the Crimean War, not had to first capture the city of Puebla.

The French thought Puebla would be a cakewalk, that the city’s power elite would welcome them with magnolia blossoms.

However, what the French found was a ragtag, ill-equipped but valiant army commanded by Gen. Ignacio Zaragoza de Seguin, who, ironically, was born in what today is Goliad, Texas, when the region was part of Mexico.

On May 5, 1862, the French attacked recklessly. Within two hours, the French troops had expended half of their ammunition.

The decisive maneuver of the day was led by future Mexican dictator but then a young Brig. Gen. Porfirio Diaz. The commander of the Second Brigade led a late afternoon counterattack that repelled a determined French assault on Zaragoza’s right flank.

The dejected French soldiers retreated to await reinforcements…………………………….

Mexican writer Justo Sierra in “The Political Revolution of the Mexican People” wrote that the Cinco de Mayo victory gave the United States “an involuntary service … of inestimable value.”

The pressure the United States put on the French to withdraw inadvertently repaid Mexico for preventing a Franco-Confederacy alliance that could have altered the history of the entire hemisphere.”

05
May
09

Cinco History

http://www.vivacincodemayo.org/history.htm

From the page: “Under the command of Texas-born General Zaragosa, (and the cavalry under the command of Colonel Porfirio Diaz, later to be Mexico’s president and dictator), the Mexicans awaited. Brightly dressed French Dragoons led the enemy columns. The Mexican Army was less stylish.

General Zaragosa ordered Colonel Diaz to take his cavalry, the best in the world, out to the French flanks. In response, the French did a most stupid thing; they sent their cavalry off to chase Diaz and his men, who proceeded to butcher them. The remaining French infantrymen charged the Mexican defenders through sloppy mud from a thunderstorm and through hundreds of head of stampeding cattle stirred up by Indians armed only with machetes.

When the battle was over, many French were killed or wounded and their cavalry was being chased by Diaz’ superb horsemen miles away. The Mexicans had won a great victory that kept Napoleon III from supplying the confederate rebels for another year, allowing the United States to build the greatest army the world had ever seen. This grand army smashed the Confederates at Gettysburg just 14 months after the battle of Puebla, essentially ending the Civil War.

Union forces were then rushed to the Texas/Mexican border under General Phil Sheridan, who made sure that the Mexicans got all the weapons and ammunition they needed to expel the French. American soldiers were discharged with their uniforms and rifles if they promised to join the Mexican Army to fight the French. The American Legion of Honor marched in the Victory Parade in Mexico, City.

It might be a historical stretch to credit the survival of the United States to those brave 4,000 Mexicans who faced an army twice as large in 1862. But who knows?”

05
May
09

Big Dogs House & Blog Archive & Abandoning The Free Market Will Not Fix It

http://www.onebigdog.net/abandoning-the-free-market-will-not-fix-it/

From the page: “The economic tough times we are going through are the result of many things. But one thing is certain and that is the tough times are not the result of free market principles. The free market takes care of issues unless there is intervention from outside influences. In this case, the socialistic practices and greed of past administrations and American businesses have combined to cause the problem.

The idea that we need to give people loans for houses they cannot afford is not a free market principle. Forcing companies to pay a minimum wage that government sets based on some arbitrary target rather than the supply and demand of a workforce is not free market. Allowing businesses to hire illegals for well under the market price for a job is not part of the free market. Developing gimmicky investment vehicles in order to turn a quick buck at the expense of others is unethical and not free market. Too much government intervention is not part of the free market and it stifles growth. Combine this with politicians lining their pockets at our expense and we have a recipe for disaster. These are the reasons we got into trouble.

However, President Bush and the Congress failed to see all this and they decided that the best way to fix things was to interfere even more in the free market so that it could go further into chaos. The financial bailout was an intervention that should never have happened. The economic collapse should not have happened but politicians decided that everyone needed a home and investors decided that they needed get rich quick schemes. Then, when it all went south the government got more involved and infused taxpayer money into the mess. The 700 billion dollars has morphed into trillions of dollars in bailouts and there is no end in sight. None of it has helped the economy because the infusion of money only prolongs the pain and delays the inevitable.

President Bush says that he abandoned free market principles to save the economy. He is only partly right. Free market principles were abandoned a long time ago. He is only doing more of the same of what has been going on and it will not help one bit. George Bush is using Socialism to try and fix a free market system when Socialism caused the problem.

Businesses should make it or fail on their own. Bankers and Wall Street tycoons should be left to fail. When they made billions of dollars they did not rush to DC to give money to the government and they did not hand it out to the taxpayer. When they got in trouble they had their hands in taxpayer pockets for help. They should fail. There will always be another ready to step in and take their place. This goes for the Big Three auto makers as well. If they are unable to make it then they should go under and someone can take over and buy them out or they can cease to be.

George Bush saying that he abandoned free market principles to save the economy is like a priest saying he abandoned religion to save peopleā€s souls. It is like saying that we abandon morality to make people more moral. It is ridiculous and it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

We need to get BACK to free market principles and let the situation influence the outcome.”

04
May
09

sidewayss favorite websites – StumbleUpon

http://sideways.stumbleupon.com/

I thumbed her up over a year and a half ago, and she still has quality stumbles .

Thumbs up again

04
May
09

Steve Osborn: Free Speech or Permission to Speak? & karmalised

http://karmalised.com/?p=8016

gitmo-protest-webThe First Amendment to the Constitution reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When we accept the government’s (Federal, State or Local) requirement as to time and place to protest or demonstrate; When we agree to demonstrate only far from where the demonstration needs to take place; when we agree to limit the scope of our grievances to avoid embarrassing the officials we are trying to wake up, then we are voluntarily giving up that First Amendment right.
What is not understood by most people is that the Bill of Rights does not give us permission to exercise the Rights of Man, it forbids the government from interfering! Read the Bill of Rights, read the Constitution. Then look at what the government has usurped with its misnamed PATRIOT ACT and the other acts of similar ilk that illegally cancel out the Constitution and its first ten amendments.

When We the People cannot stand in front of the White House and make our grievances known, we might as well be demonstrating in front of the Reichstag in 1930’s Germany. The results will ultimately be the same”

04
May
09

Pro Libertate: Pinning Us Down: The “Public Health” Rationale for Tyranny

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2009/04/pinning-us-down-public-health-rationale.html

From the page: “Pinning Us Down: The “Public Health” Rationale for Tyranny

Like the H1N1 flu virus that is the focus of growing public alarm, the Homeland Security State is a recombinant entity.

The H1N1 pathogen is composed of strains of influenza that don’t naturally fuse together. In similar fashion, the Homeland Security apparat has subsumed numerous functions that are not mutually compatible.

The DHS claims the power to regulate everything from border security to the political views of domestic “extremists” — the latter being a relatively recent assignment. Within this mandate it also treats environmental disasters (earthquakes, fires, floods) and diseases as “security” issues as well, rather than as acts of God or the inhospitable results of impersonal natural processes.”

04
May
09

Welcome to The CrowHouse.

http://thecrowhouse.com/

vajraguru333 rated 5 months agoMax Igan is a beautiful soul on a selfless mission to reveal secrets of ancient civilisations and indeed the dark secrets of modern conspiracies.




May 2009
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031