http://www.thatvideosite.com/video/dont_drown_baby_elephant
From the comments section:
MAN KIND 
3 weeks ago
…wait. It has a trunk. So, couldn’t it stand completely submerged but keep it’s trunk above the water? ….and still breath? Or is that just in the cartoons?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futility,_or_the_Wreck_of_the_Titan
From the page: ” Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan was an 1898 novella written by Morgan Robertson. The story features the ocean liner Titan, which sinks in the North Atlantic after striking an iceberg. The Titan and its sinking have been noted to be very similar to the real-life passenger ship RMS Titanic, which sank fourteen years later. “
http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/h-j-res-62-amending-the-constitution-to-end-states-rights/
From the page: ” Any amendments to the Constitution must be ratified by the legislatures of three/fourths of the states. Congress, neither House nor Senate, has the authority to alter or amend anything in the Constitution in and of their respective bodies.
So what are they after?
With numerous states voting to opt out of Obamacare, along with the huge number of states that refused to implement any provisions of REAL ID, and now the growing movement to squash the fake food safety bill which had nothing to do with food safety and everything to do with seizing control of the food production and supply and to force that supply into export, the Re-thug-licrats are looking for ways to nullify-nullification.
This resolution is intended to make it virtually impossible to reject non-positive code & title, such as Code 7 Agriculture. Agriculture is not in the enumerated powers of the Federal government. Title 7 exists only on paper and is not codified into public law as it is not within the Federal government’s power. It is not enforceable on the federal level.
If the Re-thug-licrats have their way, this proposed amendment would take away the right of individual states, in and of themselves, to determine that a federal law or regulation would be so detrimental, such an abrogation of Constitutional provisions and rights, that they will not comply with it. That would mean that according to the Article 5 amended, it would take three/fourths of the states to repeal, refuse or reject any federal intrusion into the individual states business. We would lose our independent states right, to nullify harmful and unlawful federal laws and regulations. We could, by sheer force of numbers, be forced to comply with federal laws as the chances of three/fourths of the states agreeing to nullify would be slim to none. Which is just the way the Re-thug-licrats want it. “
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXpMzT5yGp8
From the page: Images of last week’s fatal police shooting in Miami Beach have been released.
Here you see footage recorded on a cell phone by Narces Benoit.
The police are surrounding a car driven by Raymond Herisse. Then they started firing at the 22-year-old.
Herisse was killed, three officers and four bystanders were injured.
Benoit and his girlfriend, Ericka Davis, are accusing authorities of destroying evidence and intimidation.
They say the only reason this video is still around because they were able to hide a memory card before authorities smashed the phone that captured this incident.
They have hired a lawyer, saying they “want the right thing to be done.”
From the page: “When Narces Benoit decided to use his cell phone to film Miami Beach police officers gunning down a man sitting in a parked car early Monday morning, he had no idea the same cops would eventually target him as well. According to video evidence and witness testimony, officers pointed a gun at Narces and his girlfriend, threw them to the ground, destroyed his camera and what they thought was the footage he captured, and handcuffed and arrested the couple, all because Narces happened to capture indicting video evidence of the officers†heinous actions.
The Miami Herald reports that Narces and his girlfriend were driving on Collins Avenue in South Beach, Fla., when they happened upon the shocking tail-end of a police chase involving Raymond Herisse, the suspect in question who had allegedly fled police following a scuffle. When Herisseâ€s car later came to a stop, officers surrounded the vehicle and unloaded more than 100 rounds at the car, effectively murdering Herisse and injuring four innocent bystanders.
The Miami Beach Police Department (MBPD) has tried to justify their shooting spree by claiming that Herisse attempted to run over officers with his car, but Narces†video footage, which was salvaged when he discreetly removed his cell phoneâ€s memory card and put it in his mouth before officers destroyed it, shows otherwise. In the video, it is clearly evident that Narces†vehicle had been stopped both prior to and during the time when the gang of officers murdered him in cold blood.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iCcpO1gyT4
From the page: “Miami Police Shoot Suspect, Aim Gun At Witness & Smashed Cell Phones To Cover It up. Also watch the video from an upper floor and you will see victim was applying the brakes until dead.”
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/18/the-indiana-supreme-court-guts-the-fourth-amendment/
From the page: “A ruling by the state of Indianaâ€s Supreme Court last Thursday in Barnes vs. Indiana has seemingly vacated the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment provision against unreasonable search and seizure. The case involved a domestic dispute and the Court ruled 3-2 that police can force their way into a person’s home without a warrant if they deem such entry is necessary. Writing for the majority, Justice Steven David said that “a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest.” “
From the page: The Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that people cannot keep police from entering their homes, even if the entry is “unlawful.”
In a 3-2 decision, the court held there are valid reasons for police officers to enter homes without a warrant and without knocking , including concerns for an officer’s safety or that a suspect may escape or that evidence may be destroyed.
“We believe. . .a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,” wrote Justice Steven David. “We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest.“
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/05121101shd.pdf
FTP: ” David, Justice.
A jury convicted Richard Barnes of Class A misdemeanor battery on a law enforcement officer, Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, and Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct. Barnes contests that the trial court’s failure to advise the jury on the right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers constituted reversible error and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We hold that there is no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers. We further hold that the evidence was sufficient and affirm Barnes’s convictions.”
My Weblog 